Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 128

 

Home  | About Us | Editors | Search | Ahead Of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit Article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
     


 
 
Table of Contents
EDITORIAL
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 1-2

What's new in critical illness and injury science? The costs of having a fall in Qatar!


Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB, Canada

Date of Web Publication22-Mar-2013

Correspondence Address:
Robert C McDermid
3C1.12 WMC University of Alberta Hospital, 8440 112th Street, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2B7
Canada
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2229-5151.109405

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
McDermid RC. What's new in critical illness and injury science? The costs of having a fall in Qatar!. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2013;3:1-2

How to cite this URL:
McDermid RC. What's new in critical illness and injury science? The costs of having a fall in Qatar!. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci [serial online] 2013 [cited 2019 Dec 8];3:1-2. Available from: http://www.ijciis.org/text.asp?2013/3/1/1/109405

In this issue of the International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science, we have provided insight into the incidence and financial impact of fall-related injuries in Qatar. The authors of the study assess the incidence and hospital costs of an occupational fall-related injury at approximately 114/100,000 workers and $15,000 USD per fall. [1]

Perspective can be gained by comparing this cost to the incidence and typical costs in the USA of 338/100,000 workers and $22,000 USD for a trauma admission and to the average yearly cost of hemodialysis in Saudi Arabia of $50,000 USD. [2],[3],[4] It must be emphasized that the present study design can only underestimate the incidence and true cost of these injuries and overestimate fatality rate - less severely injured patients may either have not been admitted to the trauma service or not been taken to other hospitals. Additionally, those who died before hospitalization and the costs incurred for ongoing medical care of foreign workers following repatriation were not included in the cost portion of the analysis.

Although Qatar has been ranked as the world's richest country by Forbes magazine in terms of GDP, [5] its health care expenditures in 2008 of $2.8 billion ranked 37th, at $1691 per capita for a country of 1.7 million people, compared to $7164 in the USA in 2008. [6] Consequently, this assessment of fall-related injury admitted to the only trauma center in Qatar accounts for 0.15% of Qatar's total health care expenditures, as compared to approximately 0.9% of all health care expenditures in the USA. [7],[8] Consequently, while fall-related injuries represent a significant cost in Qatar, it appears to be proportionately less than North American estimates of health care expenditures based on the data presented.

One of the reasons for undertaking a cost-of-injury study is to provide an economic perspective on health care expenditures. Unfortunately, as pointed out by Currie et al, cost-of-injury studies suffer from significant limitations. [9] While they can raise public awareness and provide important starting points for discussions of prevention strategies, they may be less useful for establishing fiscally advantageous health policy. This information can only be obtained through an examination of the cost and effectiveness of the intervention strategy in conjunction with the cost of injury, as ineffective and/or expensive prevention strategies may result in increased overall costs. Consequently, additional data are required to assess whether the costs associated with fall-related injuries will be offset by a proposed prevention program.

The authors acknowledge that the data supporting the effectiveness of multifaceted injury prevention programs are limited. The most recent Cochrane Systematic Review on injury prevention identifies three types of interventions that have been studied: government regulation, drug-free workplace programs, and safety campaigns. [10] The review emphasizes that all studies are of low methodological quality, and have small effects at most. The data suggests that government regulation alone is not sufficient to reduce the incidence of fatal and non-fatal injuries in the construction industry. Conversely, implementation of drug-free workplace programs and safety campaigns do appear to have an initial effect on the rate of non-fatal injuries, but only safety campaigns result in sustained reduction in injury rates. The lack of sustained effect with drug-free workplace programs may be in part explained by an unintended shift in the pattern of drug use after implementation of drug-use screening programs. After an initial decrease in overall illicit drug intake, drug users begin to select compounds with shorter excretion half-lives (such as cocaine). By avoiding drugs whose metabolites remain detectable for weeks (such as marijuana), the drug users avoid the consequences of a positive drug screen. On the other hand, one could postulate that an important effect of implementation of a culture of safety in the workplace may be sustained behavioral change in its workers, resulting in persistent improvement in injury rates. Unfortunately, there is no data at present supporting or refuting the potential mechanisms of these effects.

The costs of these programs vary according to the scope and intensity of the interventions. Kaskutas et al describe the development of a comprehensive fall-prevention program based upon a needs assessment of apprentice carpenters coupled with an iterative curriculum development process. [11] This program includes a simulated work-site in which apprentice carpenters learn and practice safety skills. It should be noted that although participants felt that this comprehensive practical training was useful, no clear data exist with respect to the impact of even this intervention on hard endpoints such as rate of falls, injuries or death. Thus, questions remain regarding the utility of spending the substantial financial and human resources on implementing such a program, and ultimately what party or parties would be responsible for absorbing those costs. It should be noted that a financial analysis does not quantify the deep emotional costs of these falls. As mentioned, many of the patients suffer head and spinal trauma, which undoubtedly profoundly affects the quality of life of many of the survivors. The consequences for some individuals are likely devastating, making it difficult to argue against the ethical and moral need for ongoing surveillance of the problem and institution of legislation and injury prevention measures. Ultimately, specific decisions regarding how much money to spend on a variety of prevention options are necessary - a process that also includes defining and assigning economic value to human quality and quantity of life. Such decisions are major struggles for governments and policy makers. They require input from the populace, and demand careful consideration of societal and cultural values in the context of the competing needs of the population in question.

 
   References Top

1.Tuma MA, El-Menyar A, Al-Hassani A, Al-Thani H, Maull KI, Acerra JR, et al. Epidemiology of workplace-related fall from height and cost of trauma care in Qatar. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2013;3:1-2.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Department of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor, release USDL 12-2204. Accessed from: http://:www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/osh2.pdf [Last accessed on 2012 Nov 17].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Taheri PA, Butz DA, Greenfield LJ. Length of stay has minimal impact on the cost of hospital admission. J Am Coll Surg 2000;191:123-30.  Back to cited text no. 3
[PUBMED]    
4.Al Saran K, Sabry A. The cost of hemodialysis in a large hemodialysis center. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl 2012;23:78-82  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Available from: http://www.forbes.com/sites/bethgreenfield/2012/02/22/the-worlds-richest-countries. [Last accessed on 2012 Nov 8].  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.WHO Department of Health Statistics and Informatics (May 13, 2011). World Health Statistics. Geneva: WHO; 2011. Available from: http://www.who.int/whosis/whostat/EN_WHS2011_Full.pdf [Last accessed on 2012 Nov 17 2012].  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.NSC. Report on injuries in America 2002. Itasca, IL: National Safety Council; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health, United States, 2011. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/hus/hus11.pdf [Last accessed on 2012].  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Currie G, Kerfoot KD, Donaldson D, Macarthur C. Are costs of injury studies useful? Inj Prev 2000;6:175-6.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Van der Molen H, Lehtola MM, Lappalainen J, Hoonakker PL, Hsiao H, Haslam RA, et al. Interventions for preventing injuries in the construction industry. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007:CD006251.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Kaskutas V, Dale AM, Lipscomb H, Gaal J, Fuchs M, Evanoff B. Changes in fall prevention training for apprentice carpenters based on a comprehensive needs assessment. J Saf Res 2010;41:221-7.  Back to cited text no. 11
[PUBMED]    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1540    
    Printed67    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded81    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal