|Year : 2018 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 48-51
Right carotid-cutaneous fistula and right carotid pseudoaneurysm formation secondary to a chronically infected polyethylene terephthalate patch
WT Hillman Terzian1, Samuel Schadt2, Sharvil U Sheth3
1 Department of General Surgery, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
2 Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA
3 Department of General Surgery, Vascular Surgery Section, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA
|Date of Web Publication||9-Mar-2018|
Dr. W T Hillman Terzian
Department of General Surgery, St. Luke's University Health Network, 801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) remains the treatment for significant carotid stenosis and stroke prevention. Approximately 100,000 CEAs are performed in the United States every year. Randomized trials have demonstrated an advantage of patch carotid angioplasty over primary closure. Complications from patches include thrombosis, transient ischemic attack, stroke, restenosis, pseudoaneurysm (PA), and infection. PA after CEA is rare, with a reported average of 0.37% of cases. We describe an unusual case of PA after polyethylene terephthalate (PTFE) patching for CEA. An 88-year-old female with Alzheimer's disease living in a nursing facility with a history of skin cancer on her right chest developed a new area of intermittent brisk bleeding on her right neck which was initially believed to be related to her skin cancer. She had a remote history of right CEA with a PTFE patch approximately a decade ago. A computed tomography angiograph-head-and-neck with showed a partially thrombosed PA in the region of her right common carotid artery bifurcation with a tract containing gas and fluid extending to the skin surface suspicious for a partially thrombosed, leaking PA. She was taken urgently to the operating room on broad-spectrum antibiotics where we performed a right neck exploration, ligation of a bleeding carotid PA by ligation of the right common, internal, and external carotid arteries, explantation of a chronically infected polyethylene terephthalate patch, and closure with a sternocleidomastoid advanced flap with multilayered closure. She was discharged to her nursing facility with 6 weeks of ceftriaxone intravenous (IV) and metronidazole IV through a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line with no neurological sequelae.
Keywords: Carotid artery endarterectomy, polyethylene terephthalate patch, pseudoaneurysm
|How to cite this article:|
Hillman Terzian W T, Schadt S, Sheth SU. Right carotid-cutaneous fistula and right carotid pseudoaneurysm formation secondary to a chronically infected polyethylene terephthalate patch. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2018;8:48-51
|How to cite this URL:|
Hillman Terzian W T, Schadt S, Sheth SU. Right carotid-cutaneous fistula and right carotid pseudoaneurysm formation secondary to a chronically infected polyethylene terephthalate patch. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci [serial online] 2018 [cited 2019 Dec 6];8:48-51. Available from: http://www.ijciis.org/text.asp?2018/8/1/48/227060
| Introduction|| |
Carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA) remains the treatment for significant carotid stenosis and stroke prevention. Approximately 100,000 CEAs are performed in the United States every year. Randomized trials have demonstrated an advantage of patch carotid angioplasty over primary closure in reduction of stroke, death, arterial occlusion, and return to surgery for repair of the arteriotomy created during CEA. Meta-analysis favors patching for a reduction of long-term restenosis rate. Common types of carotid artery patch material are autologous vein, bovine and porcine pericardium, polyethylene terephthalate (PTFE) or Dacron, and expanded PTFE (ePTFE). Complications from patches include thrombosis, transient ischemic attack (TIA), stroke, restenosis, pseudoaneurysm (PA), and infection.
PA after CEA is rare, with a reported average of 0.37% of cases. It can occur due to suture failure, degeneration of the arterial wall or patch material, and infection. Infection is associated with 33% of PAs and is most associated with staphylococci. PA is twice as common in patch angioplasty than in primary closure, and prosthetic patch angioplasty has a greater risk of PA formation than when using venous patches.
A Cochrane review including 13 trials with 2083 operations analyzed different materials used for CEA artery closure. Within the review, seven trials compared vein closure to PTFE, and six compared Dacron grafts to other synthetic materials. Dacron and ePTFE patches had similar rates of restenosis and occlusion compared to vein patches. There were no significant differences in the outcomes between vein patches and synthetic materials, except PAs. Two additional conclusions were based on small outcomes and the significance was uncertain: PAs occurred less frequently in synthetic patches than vein patches, and Dacron grafts were associated with a higher risk of stroke, TIA, thrombosis, and restenosis. Two trials showed a significant reduction in the risk of PA with PTFE patching (0.8%) compared with vein patching (11.9%)., Two other trials did not report any PAs in either group. The clinical significance of PA formation in PTFE patching was unclear as none of the PAs ruptured or caused ipsilateral strokes.,
| Case Report|| |
We describe an unusual case of PA after polyethylene terephthalate (PTFE) patching for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). An 88-year-old female with Alzheimer's disease living in a nursing facility with a history of skin cancer on her right chest developed a new area of intermittent brisk bleeding on her right neck which was initially believed to be related to her skin cancer. The new-onset bleeding initially occurred 6 weeks before the patient's arrival at our hospital. A general surgeon rounding at the patient's facility recommended a computed tomography (CT) scan, but the patient refused and her family supported her decision. Instead, the wound was bandaged and kept clean. The bleeding eventually stopped, but suddenly occurred again the night of her arrival to our hospital [Figure 1]. Her past medical history included hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease Stage III, skin cancer of the right chest wall (not formally evaluated), and a right CEA with a polyethylene terephthalate patch approximately a decade ago. Her vital signs were normal and her hemoglobin was 11.5 on arrival and hence, we ordered a CT angiograph (CTA)-head-and-neck with showed a partially thrombosed PA in the region of her right common carotid artery bifurcation with a tract containing gas and fluid extending to the skin surface suspicious for a partially thrombosed, leaking PA [Figure 2]. The CTA also showed a markedly attenuated right internal carotid artery as it entered the skull base. She was taken urgently to the operating room on broad spectrum antibiotics where we performed a right neck exploration, ligation of a bleeding carotid PA by ligation of the right common, internal, and external carotid arteries, explantation of a chronically infected polyethylene terephthalate patch, and closure with a sternocleidomastoid advanced flap with multilayered closure [Figure 3]. Wound cultures eventually grew Streptococcus anginosus and diphtheroids. She was discharged to her nursing facility with 6 weeks of ceftriaxone intravenous (IV) and metronidazole IV through a PICC line with no neurological sequelae.
|Figure 2: Computed tomography angiograph showing partially thrombosed pseudoaneurysm with tract containing gas and fluid extending to the skin surface|
Click here to view
|Figure 3: Explanation of a chronically infected polyethylene terephthalate patch and a probe traversing a right carotid-cutaneous fistula|
Click here to view
| Discussion|| |
Randomized trials have demonstrated an advantage of patch carotid angioplasty over primary closure in carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgery. There are several well-known complications of this CEA, and the overall morbidity and mortality rates are <6% in symptomatic patients and <3% in asymptomatic patients., The complications and timing of these complications include stroke (perioperative <3% for asymptomatic patients and <5% for symptomatic patients),,,,,,,, myocardial infection (<2% risk within 30 days), hyperperfusion syndrome – essentially a syndrome of cerebral reperfusion after years of a low-flow carotid vascular bed resulting in ipsilateral headache, focal seizures, or rarely, intracerebral hemorrhage (1%–3% of cases within 2 weeks),,,, cervical hematoma (3.4% overall incidence, with an increased risk if receiving antiplatelet or anticoagulation postoperatively),,,,, nerve injury (the majority of cranial nerve injuries resolve after surgery, with the risk of permanent cranial nerve injury <1%; the most commonly injured nerves, in order of incidence, are the hypoglossal nerve, facial nerve, and vagus and glossopharyngeal nerves with similar incidences),, carotid restenosis (up to 20% of cases originally, although more recent literature suggests lower values of 2.6%–10% at 5 years; early stenosis occurs within 2–3 years of the CEA when the restenosed area becomes highly cellular and minimally ulcerated – resulting in a minimal risk of consequential embolization – and late stenosis, which occurs after 2–3 years postoperatively and is the result of ongoing atherosclerosis – resulting in a new potential source of embolic disease),,,,,,,,,, and finally infection.
Wound infections occur rarely and usually superficial. For most deep infections, such as what occurred in our patient, there is usually carotid patch involvement – although data regarding this is very limited and mostly based on case series. There is not adequate data in the literature to determine whether or not a specific type of foreign patch increases infection risk, and the infections themselves have been known to occur years later. Usually when deep infections present early, the patient has neck swelling and drainage at the incision site; later-occurring deep infections are known to present as draining sinus tracts or pulsatile neck masses indicating PA. Initial management usually is directed at empirically treating Staphylococcus and Streptococcus species, about half of the cases may resolve with antibiotics alone. If the infection is persistent, patch excision is mandated in conjunction with carotid artery ligation (as in our patient), reconstruction with autogenous vein graft, or bypass.
Since there are so few cases of deep infections in the literature, it is important to report these cases. As we previously mentioned, it is believe that PA is twice as common in patch angioplasty than in primary closure, and prosthetic patch angioplasty has a greater risk of PA formation than when using venous patches. The patient, an 88-year-old female with Alzheimer's disease living in a nursing facility with a history of skin cancer on her right chest, developed a new area of intermittent brisk bleeding for 6 weeks on her right neck which was initially believed to be related to her skin cancer. She had a remote history of right CEA with polyethylene terephthalate (PTFE) patching. The bleeding eventually stopped not only atypical for Pas but also suddenly occurred again the night of her arrival to our hospital. She was eventually diagnosed with a right carotid-cutaneous fistula and right carotid PA formation secondary to a chronically-infected PTFE patch.
Quick recognition of this rare complication is essential when it occurs and care should be taken while in the operating room. Since bleeding may be intermittent, surgeons should maintain a high index of suspicion for this condition whenever there is unexplained intermittent bleeding at the skin overlying a known CEA surgical site. A CTA is an appropriate diagnostic test to consider in these cases. For our patient, wound cultures eventually grew S. anginosus and diphtheroids; however, cultures are not always positive. As such, long-term antibiotic is necessary as a chronically-infected patch is often the inciting factor and cultures are not always positive. Coverage should be broad if there is no positive culture.
Although the literature remains somewhat sparse to support our hypothesis, it is our belief that our patient's PTFE patch may have played a key role in the formation of her chronic PA since we use bovine pericardial patches at our institution when patching is necessary and we have not seen this type of late-presenting deep infection yet in our own patients.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form the patient(s) has/have given his/her/their consent for his/her/their images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patients understand that their names and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal their identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Muto A, Nishibe T, Dardik H, Dardik A. Patches for carotid artery endarterectomy: Current materials and prospects. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:206-13.
Bond R, Rerkasem K, AbuRahma AF, Naylor AR, Rothwell PM. Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;2:CD000160.
Krishnan S, Clowes AW. Dacron patch infection after carotid endarterectomy: Case report and review of the literature. Ann Vasc Surg 2006;20:672-7.
Abdelhamid MF, Wall ML, Vohra RK. Carotid artery pseudoaneurysm after carotid endarterectomy: Case series and a review of the literature. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2009;43:571-7.
Ehrenfeld WK, Hays RJ. False aneurysm after carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg 1972;104:288-91.
Borazjani BH, Wilson SE, Fujitani RM, Gordon I, Mueller M, Williams RA, et al.
Postoperative complications of carotid patching: Pseudoaneurysm and infection. Ann Vasc Surg 2003;17:156-61.
Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;2:CD000071.
González-Fajardo JA, Pérez JL, Mateo AM. Saphenous vein patch versus polytetrafluoroethylene patch after carotid endarterectomy. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 1994;35:523-8.
Ricco JB, Demarque C, Bouin-Pineau MH, Camiade C. Vein Patch Versus PTFE Patch for Carotid Endarterectomy. A Randomized Trial in a Selected Group of Patients. Manuscript Submitted to the European Journal of Vascular Surgery; 1996.
AbuRahma AF, Khan JH, Robinson PA, Saiedy S, Short YS, Boland JP, et al.
Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with primary closure and patch angioplasty with saphenous vein, jugular vein, and polytetrafluoroethylene: Perioperative (30-day) results. J Vasc Surg 1996;24:998-1006.
Hayes PD, Allroggen H, Steel S, Thompson MM, London NJ, Bell PR, et al.
Randomized trial of vein versus Dacron patching during carotid endarterectomy: Influence of patch type on postoperative embolization. J Vasc Surg 2001;33:994-1000.
Moore WS, Barnett HJ, Beebe HG, Bernstein EF, Brener BJ, Brott T, et al.
Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc committee, American Heart Association. Circulation 1995;91:566-79.
Biller J, Feinberg WM, Castaldo JE, Whittemore AD, Harbaugh RE, Dempsey RJ, et al.
Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy: A statement for Healthcare Professionals from a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Heart Association. Circulation 1998;97:501-9.
Wu TY, Anderson NE, Barber PA. Neurological complications of carotid revascularisation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2012;83:543-50.
Hill MD, Brooks W, Mackey A, Clark WM, Meschia JF, Morrish WF, et al.
Stroke after carotid stenting and endarterectomy in the carotid revascularization endarterectomy versus stenting trial (CREST). Circulation 2012;126:3054-61.
Saedon M, Singer DR, Pang R, Tiivas C, Hutchinson CE, Imray CH, et al.
Registry report on kinetics of rescue antiplatelet treatment to abolish cerebral microemboli after carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 2013;44:230-3.
Heyer EJ, Mergeche JL, Bruce SS, Ward JT, Stern Y, Anastasian ZH, et al.
Statins reduce neurologic injury in asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy patients. Stroke 2013;44:1150-2.
Faggioli G, Pini R, Mauro R, Gargiulo M, Freyrie A, Stella A, et al.
Perioperative outcome of carotid endarterectomy according to type and timing of neurologic symptoms and computed tomography findings. Ann Vasc Surg 2013;27:874-82.
Sfyroeras GS, Bessias N, Moulakakis KG, Lyra S, Kotsikoris I, Andrikopoulos V, et al.
New cerebral ischemic lesions after carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 2013;27:883-7.
Barbetta I, Carmo M, Mercandalli G, Lattuada P, Mazzaccaro D, Settembrini AM, et al.
Outcomes of urgent carotid endarterectomy for stable and unstable acute neurologic deficits. J Vasc Surg 2014;59:440-6.
Goldberg JB, Goodney PP, Kumbhani SR, Roth RM, Powell RJ, Likosky DS, et al.
Brain injury after carotid revascularization: Outcomes, mechanisms, and opportunities for improvement. Ann Vasc Surg 2011;25:270-86.
Boulanger M, Camelière L, Felgueiras R, Berger L, Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM, et al.
Periprocedural myocardial infarction after carotid endarterectomy and stenting: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Stroke 2015;46:2843-8.
Youkey JR, Clagett GP, Jaffin JH, Parisi JE, Rich NM. Focal motor seizures complicating carotid endarterectomy. Arch Surg 1984;119:1080-4.
Reigel MM, Hollier LH, Sundt TM Jr., Piepgras DG, Sharbrough FW, Cherry KJ, et al.
Cerebral hyperperfusion syndrome: A cause of neurologic dysfunction after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 1987;5:628-34.
Naylor AR, Ruckley CV. The post-carotid endarterectomy hyperperfusion syndrome. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1995;9:365-7.
Coutts SB, Hill MD, Hu WY. Hyperperfusion syndrome: Toward a stricter definition. Neurosurgery 2003;53:1053-58.
Doig D, Turner EL, Dobson J, Featherstone RL, de Borst GJ, Brown MM, et al.
Incidence, impact, and predictors of cranial nerve palsy and haematoma following carotid endarterectomy in the international carotid stenting study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014;48:498-504.
Payne DA, Twigg MW, Hayes PD, Naylor AR. Antiplatelet agents and risk factors for bleeding postcarotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 2010;24:900-7.
Comerota AJ, Difiore R, Tzilinis A, Chahwan S. Cervical hematoma following carotid endarterectomy is morbid and preventable: A 12-year case-controlled review. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2012;46:610-6.
Rosenbaum A, Rizvi AZ, Alden PB, Tretinyak AS, Graber JN, Goldman JA, et al.
Outcomes related to antiplatelet or anticoagulation use in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 2011;25:25-31.
Morales Gisbert SM, Sala Almonacil VA, Zaragozá García JM, Genovés Gascó B, Gómez Palonés FJ, Ortiz Monzón E, et al.
Predictors of cervical bleeding after carotid endarterectomy. Ann Vasc Surg 2014;28:366-74.
Cunningham EJ, Bond R, Mayberg MR, Warlow CP, Rothwell PM. Risk of persistent cranial nerve injury after carotid endarterectomy. J Neurosurg 2004;101:445-8.
Fokkema M, de Borst GJ, Nolan BW, Indes J, Buck DB, Lo RC, et al.
Clinical relevance of cranial nerve injury following carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2014;47:2-7.
Zierler RE, Bandyk DF, Thiele BL, Strandness DE Jr. Carotid artery stenosis following endarterectomy. Arch Surg 1982;117:1408-15.
Counsell CE, Salinas R, Naylor R, Warlow CP. A systematic review of the randomised trials of carotid patch angioplasty in carotid endarterectomy. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;13:345-54.
LaMuraglia GM, Stoner MC, Brewster DC, Watkins MT, Juhola KL, Kwolek C, et al.
Determinants of carotid endarterectomy anatomic durability: Effects of serum lipids and lipid-lowering drugs. J Vasc Surg 2005;41:762-8.
Goodney PP, Nolan BW, Eldrup-Jorgensen J, Likosky DS, Cronenwett JL; Vascular Study Group of Northern New England. Restenosis after carotid endarterectomy in a multicenter regional registry. J Vasc Surg 2010;52:897-904, 905.e1-2.
Dorigo W, Pulli R, Fargion A, Pratesi G, Angiletta D, Aletto I, et al.
Comparison of open and endovascular treatments of post-carotid endarterectomy restenosis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013;45:437-42.
Lal BK, Beach KW, Roubin GS, Lutsep HL, Moore WS, Malas MB, et al.
Restenosis after carotid artery stenting and endarterectomy: A secondary analysis of CREST, a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2012;11:755-63.
Hertzer NR, Bena JF. Patching plus extended exposure and tacking of the common carotid cuff may reduce the late incidence of recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2013;58:926-340.
Kang J, Conrad MF, Patel VI, Mukhopadhyay S, Garg A, Cambria MR, et al.
Clinical and anatomic outcomes after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2014;59:944-9.
Pavela J, Ahanchi S, Steerman SN, Higgins JA, Panneton JM. Grayscale median analysis of primary stenosis and restenosis after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2014;59:978-82.
Chan RC, Chan YC, Cheung GC, Cheng SW. Predictors of restenosis after carotid endarterectomy: 17-year experience in a tertiary referral vascular center. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2014;48:201-6.
Mann CD, McCarthy M, Nasim A, Bown M, Dennis M, Sayers R, et al.
Management and outcome of prosthetic patch infection after carotid endarterectomy: A single-centre series and systematic review of the literature. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2012;44:20-6.
Stone PA, Srivastava M, Campbell JE, Mousa AY, Hass SH, Kazmi H, et al.
A 10-year experience of infection following carotid endarterectomy with patch angioplasty. J Vasc Surg 2011;53:1473-7.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]