Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 7959

 

Home  | About Us | Editors | Search | Ahead Of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit Article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
     


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2013  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 246-249

Influence of non-surgical risk factors on anastomotic leakage after major gastrointestinal surgery: Audit from a tertiary care teaching institute


Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, GB Pant Hospital, New Delhi, India

Date of Web Publication2-Jan-2014

Correspondence Address:
Anirban Hom Choudhuri
2/203, East End Apartments, Mayur Vihar I (extn), Delhi 110 096
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2229-5151.124117

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Context: The occurence of anastomotic leakage after gastointestinal resection and anastomosis is associated with significant mortality and morbidity.
Aims: There is dearth of evidence in the literature on the influence of various non-surgical factors in causing anastomotic leakage although many studies have identified their possible role.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective audit of all the anastomotic leakages occurring between September 2009 and April 2012 in our institute was performed to identify the potential non-surgical factors that can influence anastomotic leakage. A total of 137 out of 1246 patients who developed anastmotic leak were analyzed. All the potential non-surgical causes of anastomotic leakage available in the literature were analyzed by univariate analysis and stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was done after adjusting for the type of surgery. An intergroup comparison among the patients based on the type of surgery was also performed.
Results: The following factors were found to be independently associated with increased risk of anastomotic leak: (1) albumin <3.5 g/dl, (2) anemia <8 g/dl, (3) hypotension (4) use of inotropes, and (5) blood transfusion. The majority of anastomotic leaks occurred after pancreatic surgeries followed by esophagectomies and occurred least after colonic resections.The risk for anastomotic leak was four times more in patients who required inotropic support in the perioperative period and three times more in patients who developed hypotension.
Conclusions: Our study is the first retrospective audit to identify the influence of non-surgical factors for anastomotic leakage and the need for further observational studies in this direction.

Keywords: Anastomotic leakage, non-surgical factors, major gastrointestinal surgery


How to cite this article:
Choudhuri AH, Uppal R, Kumar M. Influence of non-surgical risk factors on anastomotic leakage after major gastrointestinal surgery: Audit from a tertiary care teaching institute. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2013;3:246-9

How to cite this URL:
Choudhuri AH, Uppal R, Kumar M. Influence of non-surgical risk factors on anastomotic leakage after major gastrointestinal surgery: Audit from a tertiary care teaching institute. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci [serial online] 2013 [cited 2021 Dec 4];3:246-9. Available from: https://www.ijciis.org/text.asp?2013/3/4/246/124117


   Introduction Top


Anastomotic leakage is an uncommon but dreaded complication after major gastrointestinal surgeries like esophagectomies, pancreaticoduodenectomies, hepaticojejunostomies, low anterior resection of rectum, etc., Any anastomotic leak affects the morbidity and mortality associated with surgery to a variable degree. A low rectal anastomosis may have a leakage rate as low as 5% while anastomosis after esophagectomies and pancretoduodenectomies may have leakage rates as high as 20%. [1] The mortality rates after leakage from cervical anastomosis is higher than leakage after thoracic anastomosis in esophagectomies. [2] Besides the skill and technique involved during surgery various non-surgical factors are believed to influence the occurrence of anastomotic failure and leakage. They include male sex, ASA score, emergency surgery, obesity, smoking and alcohol abuse, perioperative fluid management, blood transfusion among the many.

The aim of this retrospective audit was to identify the influence of non-surgical risk factors on the occurrence of anastomotic leakage after major gastrointestinal surgeries.


   Materials and Methods Top


All the patients who developed anastomotic leakage following major abdominal surgery before discharge from September 2009 to April 2012 in GB Pant Hospital, New Delhi, were identified. The anesthesia charts of these patients were retrieved and an audit was performed to identify the non-surgical risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage.

The preoperative data registered included the age, gender, ASA score, body mass index (BMI), smoking history, diabetes, hemoglobin level, albumin level, and lung function.

The perioperative data included the duration of surgical procedure, perioperative blood loss, blood transfusion, colloid administration, mean arterial pressure, need for inotropic support, administration of epidural analgesia, and duration of postoperative mechanical ventilation. The experience of the surgeon and anesthetist were not recorded as all the surgeons and anesthetists had similar experience.

The intraoperative complications like hypotension, requirement of inotropes, blood and blood products transfusion, and requirement of postoperative mechanical ventilation were recorded.

Hypotension was defined as the fall in mean arterial pressure 20% below the baseline.
"Major leaks" were defined as those which required surgical intervention and "minor leaks" which were managed conservatively.

All the patients were divided into groups based on the type of surgery. The groups were statistically compared by using Chi-square test for categorical variables and Fischer's exact t test for continuous variables; P < 0.05 was considered significant. All the variables were entered in stepwise logistic regression analysis and adjusted ORs with 95% CI were calculated. The statistical analysis was performed using a statistical software package (SPSS for Windows, version 11.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


   Results Top


A total of 140 out of 1246 patients developed anastomotic leakage after major abdominal surgeries before discharge. In three patients, some data were missing. A total of 137 patients were included for analysis.

The majority of anastomotic leaks occurred after pancreatic surgeries (40.9%) followed by esophagectomies (24.0%), choledochal cyst resections (17.5%), Roux-Y-hepaticojejunostomies for benign biliary stricture (15.3%), and colonic resections (2.1%). The mortality was highest with esophageal leaks (18.1%) followed by pancreatic leaks (12.5%) and was least with hepaticojejunostomies for choledochal cyst (8.3%).The characteristics of the anastomotic leakages are shown in [Table 1].
Table 1: The characteristics of anastomotic leaks after major abdominal surgery

Click here to view


There was not much of variation in the preoperative variables [Table 2] except that the mean hemoglobin in the patients with carcinoma of colon was significantly lower than other patients. The albumin level was significantly lower in patients with carcinoma of esophagus and carcinoma of pancreas.

Among the perioperative variables [Table 3], the mean blood pressure was significantly lower and requirements for blood transfusion were significantly higher in patients with carcinoma of esophagus. The perioperative administration of colloid was significantly higher in patients with carcinoma of pancreas.

The occurrence of perioperative hypotension and requirement of blood transfusion was more in the group of patients with carcinoma of esophagus [Table 4]. The need for inotropes was significantly more in the patients with carcinoma of pancreas [Table 4].
Table 2: The preoperative variables in patients developing anastomotic leak

Click here to view
Table 3: Perioperative variables in patient developing anastomotic leak

Click here to view
Table 4: Incidence of intraoperative complications in patients developing anastomotic leak

Click here to view


A stepwise multiple logistic regression analysis was done after adjusting the variables for the type of surgery. The following factors were found to be independently associated with increased risk of anastomotic leak: (1) albumin < 3.5 g/dl) (2) anemia < 8 g/dl, (3) hypotension (4) use of inotropes, and (5) blood transfusion [Table 5]. The risk for anastomotic leak was four times more in patients who required inotropic support in the perioperative period and three times more likely in patients who developed hypotension [Table 5].
Table 5: Independent risk factors for anastomotic leak after major abdominal surgery

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The present study identifies the potential non-surgical risk factors associated with anastomotic leakage after major abdominal surgery. Although many studies are available in the literature [3],[4],[5] on the role of surgical factors causing anastomotic leakage, very few studies have identified the role of non-surgical factors which are independently associated with increased risk of anastomotic leakage. The most important pathophysiological basis for anastomotic leakage is believed to be ischemia of the gut conduit. This causes a fall in the oxygen tension of the gut submucosa which in the absence of a good collateral circulation gives rise to gut dehiscence and finally produces anastomotic leak. [6],[7]

Our study has reviewed most of the potential non-surgical factors that have been cited in the literature as potential risk factors for anastomotic leakage. It is believed that hypoalbuminemia affects anastomotic healing by impairing collagen synthesis due to lack of essential amino acids. It also reduces the host immunocompetence and makes them more vulnerable for anastomotic leakage. In our study the serum albumin in patients with leak was significantly low (P < 0.001) and patients with serum albumin <3.5 g/dl had significant greater leak. Therefore, correction of albumin levels through feeding jejunostomy may be useful in patients with hypoalbuminemia.

Both low protein and low hemoglobin affects the perfusion and oxygenation of the anastomotic margins and predisposes to anastomotic leakage. Some studies have confirmed this by doing ROC analysis in patients with large bowel cancer resections. [8],[9] However, more translational studies are required to understand the combined effects of hypoalbuminemia and anemia on gut microcirculation for better understanding the mechanism of anastomotic leakage.

Our study has also found that hypotension and the use of inotropes are independent risk factors for anastomotic leakage. This is because intraoperative hemodynamic aberrations, particularly hypotension predisposes to microvascular ischemia at the anastomotic site. One study has also found an increased anastomotic leakage with diastolic hypertension (defined as diastolic blood pressure > 90 mmHg) and the cause was attributed to microvascular ischemia. [10] Another study by Deeba, et al. [11] has found that rapid intraluminal sampling microdialysis of glucose and lactates are important factors for detection of bowel ischemia. This suggests that the hypotension may be associated with increase in lactate level in the gut mucosa increasing the susceptibility for leakage. Zakrison, et al. [12] had investigated the effect of vasopressor use in the ICU in 223 patients with 259 gastointestinal anastomosis and found that vasopressor use was associated with increased anastomotic leakage (P = 0.02, OR = 3.25). They also found that multiple vasopressors and prolonged exposure produced even higher leaking rates.

The effect of blood transfusion in activating systemic coagulation by increasing the levels of prothrombin 1 and 2 along with thrombin-antithrombin complexes has been studied. The net effect is an increased formation of microthromboses in the perianastomotic area leading to increased leakage. Our patients who had altered hemostatic balance due to hypercoagulable state after blood transfusion had more anastomotic leakage as evidenced by the odds ratio.

The increased gastrointestinal motility following epidural analgesia has been reported by some authors to be detrimental to the healing of bowel anastomosis [13] while some authors have considered it to be beneficial. [14] We did not find any risk of increased anastomotic leakage after epidural analgesia in this study.

Our study had a few limitations. One, being a retrospective audit it had all the inherent drawbacks of its design. It did not compare the variables between patients who had anastomotic leak and who did not. Two, our study did not take into consideration the anastomotic leakage which occurred after discharge from the hospital. This is because we did not find any evidence in the literature on the duration up to which the cause of anastomotic leakage can be attributed to the non-surgical factors occurring in the perioperative period. Third, although we adjusted the risk factors to the type of surgery before multiple logistic regressions and also made intergroup comparisons of the variables, we did not have the data on the duration of the adverse events like duration of inotrope use, duration of hypotension before its correction, duration of mechanical ventilation, etc., This information cannot be accurately retrieved from our present anesthesia charts because of its design and we feel the need for a change in its format.


   Conclusions Top


To conclude, ours is the first retrospective study from India to review the non-surgical factors responsible for anastomotic leakage after major abdominal surgeries. This is despite the well-accepted belief on the influence and dependency on the non-surgical factors on outcome after anastomotic leak. We also believe that our study will pave the way for more prospective and observational studies on the effects of non-surgical risk factors for anastomotic leakage after specific surgeries.

 
   References Top

1.Fouda E, El Nakeeb A, Magdy A, Hammad EA, Othman G, Farid M. Early detection of anastomotic leakage after elective low anterior resection. J Gastrointest Surg 2011;15:137-44.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.Blewett CJ, Miller JD, Young JE, Bennett WF, Urschel JD. Anastomotic leaks after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A comparison of thoracic and cervical anastomoses. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;7:75-8.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.Telem DA, Chin EH, Nquyen SQ, Divino CM. Risk factors for anastomotic leak following colorectal surgery: A case-control study. Arch Surg 2010;145:371-6.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.Yang YM, Tian XD, Zhuang Y, Wang WM, Wan YL, Huang YT. Risk factors of pancreatic leakage after pancreaticoduodenectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2005;11:2456-61.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.Tabatabai A, Hashemi M, Mohajeri G, Ahmadinejad M, Khan IA, Haghdani S. Incidence and risk factors predisposing anastomotic leak after transhiatal esophagectomy. Ann Thorac Med 2009;4:197-200.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]  Medknow Journal  
6.Whooley BP, Law S, Alexandrou A, Murthy SC, Wong J. Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer. Am J Surg 2001;181:198-203.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H. Risk factors for anastomotic leakage for colorectal cancer: Results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg 2006;202:439-44.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.Iancu C, Mocan LC, Todea-Iancu D, Mocan T, Acalovschi I, Ionescu D, et al. Host-related predictive factors for anastomotic leakage following large bowel resections for colorectal cancer. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2008;17:299-303.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.Alves A, Panis Y, Trancart D, Regimbeau JM, Pocard M, Valleur P. Factors associated with clinically significant anastomotic leakage after large bowel resection: Multivariate analysis of 707 patients. World J Surg 2002;26:499-502.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.Post IL, Verheijen PM, Pronk A, Siccama I, Houweling PL. Intraoperative blood pressure changes as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery. Int J Colorectal Dis 2012;27:765-72.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.Deeba S, Corcoles EP, Hanna GB, Pareskevas P, Aziz O, Boutelle MG, et al. Use of rapid sampling microdialysis for intraoperative monitoring of bowel ischemia. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:1408-13.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.Zakrison T, Nascimento BA Jr, Tremblay LN, Kiss A, Rizoli SB. Perioperative vasopressors are associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal anastomotic leakage. World J Surg 2007;31:1627-34.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.Carlstedt A, Nordgren S, Fasth S, Appelgren L, Hultén L. Epidural anesthesia and postoperative colorectal mortality-A possible hazard to a colorectal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis 1989;4:144-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.Schnitzler M, Kilbride MJ, Senagore A. Effect of epidural analgesia on colorectal anastomotic healing and colonic motility. Reg Anesth 1992;17:143-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]


This article has been cited by
1 Diagnosis of Anastomotic Leak
Paul T. Hernandez, Raj M. Paspulati, Skandan Shanmugan
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery. 2021; 34(06): 391
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Predictive value of postoperative C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio in anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy
Chi Zhang,Xiao Kun Li,Li Wen Hu,Chao Zheng,Zhuang Zhuang Cong,Yang Xu,Jing Luo,Gao Ming Wang,Wen Feng Gu,Kai Xie,Chao Luo,Yi Shen
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery. 2021; 16(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
3 Use of the modified Clavien-Dindo classification to determine the risk factors for early complications following radical gastrectomy and the effect of such complications on long-term prognosis
Jun Ma, Ying Wang, Shuihong Yu, Chaoping Zhou, Datian Wang, Daibin Tang, Guoqin Jiang, Yaming Zhang
World Academy of Sciences Journal. 2021; 3(6)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
4 Risk Factors of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage after McKeown Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Focus on Preoperative and Intraoperative Lung Function
Wenda Gao,Mingbo Wang,Peng Su,Fan Zhang,Chao Huang,Ziqiang Tian
Annals of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 2020;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
5 Clinical Features and Therapeutic Management of Postoperative Eso-Gastro-Duodenal Fistulas – A 6-Year Retrospective Study
Vlad Andrei Porojan,Oana Ilona David,Ionut Simion Coman,Violeta Elena Coman,Costin Florea,Cristinel Dumitru Badiu,Marius Paraschiv,Valentin Titus Grigorean
Acta Medica Transilvanica. 2020; 25(1): 36
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
6 Risk factors for surgical-site infections after radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a study in China
Yong-Qi Qiao,Li Zheng,Bei Jia,Wei-Hua Wang,Xiao-Hao Zheng,Lin-Lin Fan,Yi-Bin Xie,Yan-Tao Tian
Chinese Medical Journal. 2020; 133(13): 1540
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
7 How to reduce anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery—report from German expert meeting
Andreas D. Rink, Peter Kienle, Felix Aigner, Alexis Ulrich
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery. 2020; 405(2): 223
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
8 Patientćs characteristics, management practices and outcome of re-laparotomies in a tertiary hospital in Tanzania
Andrew Y. Swallow,Larry O. Akoko,Leonard E. Lema
Heliyon. 2020; 6(7): e04295
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
9 Utility of the cold pressor test to predict future cardiovascular events
Sjaak Pouwels,Michel E. Van Genderen,Herman G. Kreeftenberg,Rui Ribeiro,Chetan Parmar,Besir Topal,Alper Celik,Surendra Ugale
Expert Review of Cardiovascular Therapy. 2019; 17(4): 305
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
10 Reducing anastomotic leak in colorectal surgery: The old dogmas and the new challenges
Jeremy Meyer,Surennaidoo Naiken,Niki Christou,Emilie Liot,Christian Toso,Nicolas Christian Buchs,Frédéric Ris
World Journal of Gastroenterology. 2019; 25(34): 5017
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
11 The impact of perioperative inotropes on the incidence of pancreatic leak following pancreaticoduodenectomy
Patrick Casey,Madhu Parna Chaudhury,Asaad Khan,Jebran Amin,Abdul Afzal,Carmello Corallo,Domnic Sebastian,Matthew Atkinson,Daren Subar
Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery. 2019; 23(4): 392
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
12 Assessment of Sarcopenia as a Predictor of Poor Outcomes After Esophagectomy in Elderly Patients With Esophageal Cancer
Yuichiro Nakashima,Hiroshi Saeki,Ryota Nakanishi,Masahiko Sugiyama,Junji Kurashige,Eiji Oki,Yoshihiko Maehara
Annals of Surgery. 2018; 267(6): 1100
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
13 Towards optimal intraoperative conditions in esophageal surgery: A review of literature for the prevention of esophageal anastomotic leakage
Boukje Titia Bootsma,Daitlin Esmee Huisman,Victor Dirk Plat,Linda Jeanne Schoonmade,Jurre Stens,Guy Hubens,Donald Leonard van der Peet,Freek Daams
International Journal of Surgery. 2018; 54: 113
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
14 Pre-operative liver shrinking diet for bariatric surgery may impact wound healing: a randomised controlled trial
Saurav Chakravartty,Gillian Vivian,Nicola Mullholland,Hizbullah Shaikh,John McGrath,Paul S. Sidhu,Ounali Jaffer,Ameet G Patel
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2018;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
15 Stapled versus hand-sewn
Brandon Robert Bruns,David S. Morris,Martin Zielinski,Nathan T. Mowery,Preston R. Miller,Kristen Arnold,Herb A. Phelan,Jason Murry,David Turay,John Fam,John S. Oh,Oliver L. Gunter,Toby Enniss,Joseph D. Love,David Skarupa,Matthew Benns,Alisan Fathalizadeh,Pak Shan Leung,Matthew M. Carrick,Brent Jewett,Joseph Sakran,Lindsay O’Meara,Anthony V. Herrera,Hegang Chen,Thomas M. Scalea,Jose J. Diaz
Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2017; 82(3): 435
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
16 Optimal Management of a Synchronous Diagnosis of Phaeochromocytoma and Colorectal Neoplasia
Ridwaan Sohawon,Peter Truran,Jonathan Webster,Barney J Harrison,Sabapathy P Balasubramanian
Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2017;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
17 Anastomotic leaks in gastrointestinal surgery and their prevention
Tomasz Banasiewicz,Adam Dziki,Pawel Lampe,Zbigniew Lorenc,Marek Szczepkowski,Jacek Zielinski,Grzegorz Wallner
Polish Journal of Surgery. 2017; 89(2): 49
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
18 Routine Use of Contrast Swallow After Total Gastrectomy and Esophagectomy: Is it Justified?
Nader El-Sourani,Helge Bruns,Achim Troja,Hans-Rudolf Raab,Dalibor Antolovic
Polish Journal of Radiology. 2017; 82: 170
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
19 A minor but deadly surgery of colonic polypectomy in an elderly and fragile patient: a case report and the review of literature
Xiaoming Yuan,Guangrong Zhou,Yan He,Aiwen Feng
World Journal of Surgical Oncology. 2016; 14(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
20 Intraoperative modifiable risk factors of colorectal anastomotic leakage: Why surgeons and anesthesiologists should act together
S.J. van Rooijen,D. Huisman,M. Stuijvenberg,J. Stens,R.M.H. Roumen,F. Daams,G.D. Slooter
International Journal of Surgery. 2016; 36: 183
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
21 Predictive Factors for Small Intestinal and Colonic Anastomotic Leak: a Multivariate Analysis
Ahmad Sakr,Sameh Hany Emile,Emad Abdallah,Waleed Thabet,Wael Khafagy
Indian Journal of Surgery. 2016;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
22 Anastomotic Leakage Following Esophagectomy
Carolyn E. Jones,Thomas J. Watson
Thoracic Surgery Clinics. 2015; 25(4): 449
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
23 Influence of intraoperative hypotension on leaks after sleeve gastrectomy
Simon W. Nienhuijs,Uzay Kaymak,Erik Korsten,Marc P. Buise
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2015;
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
24 Prognostic and clinical impact of sarcopenia in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
K. Harada,S. Ida,Y. Baba,T. Ishimoto,K. Kosumi,R. Tokunaga,D. Izumi,M. Ohuchi,K. Nakamura,Y. Kiyozumi,Y. Imamura,M. Iwatsuki,S. Iwagami,Y. Miyamoto,Y. Sakamoto,N. Yoshida,M. Watanabe,H. Baba
Diseases of the Esophagus. 2015; : n/a
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed4425    
    Printed154    
    Emailed1    
    PDF Downloaded181    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 24    

Recommend this journal