|LETTER TO THE EDITOR
|Year : 2015 | Volume
| Issue : 1 | Page : 66-68
New year's eve pediatric celebratory gunshot wound
Jonathan W Meadows1, Veronica T Tucci2, Dainius A Drukteinis3, Kevin Farquharson3
1 Department of Emergency Medicine, Tampa General Hospital, Tampa, Florida, USA
2 Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
3 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of South Florida Morsani College of Medicine, Tampa, Florida, USA
|Date of Web Publication||2-Mar-2015|
Jonathan W Meadows
15 West 139th Street Apt: 7H, New York, NY - 10037
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
|How to cite this article:|
Meadows JW, Tucci VT, Drukteinis DA, Farquharson K. New year's eve pediatric celebratory gunshot wound. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2015;5:66-8
|How to cite this URL:|
Meadows JW, Tucci VT, Drukteinis DA, Farquharson K. New year's eve pediatric celebratory gunshot wound. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Oct 22];5:66-8. Available from: https://www.ijciis.org/text.asp?2015/5/1/66/152356
On New Year's Eve in 2011, a 12-year-old boy was transferred to the level 1 trauma center after he collapsed in a field with blood perfusing from his head; he had been watching fireworks with his family. Airway, breathing, and circulation were intact. The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) eye, verbal, and motor subscores were 1, 1, and 5, respectively. He was able to move his extremities and respond to all stimuli. On the secondary survey, blood was present in his ear canals and nose. The right eye was marked with proptosis and infraorbital ecchymosis. The bilateral upgoing plantar reflex (Babinski's sign) was noted. Initial laboratory examination was unremarkable. FAST exam was negative. The CT head study is shown in [Figure 1] and [Figure 2]. Based on the findings, the child was diagnosed with neurological trauma secondary to gunshot wound.
|Figure 1: Foreign body in maxillary sinus consistent with metallic object (i.e. bullet)|
Click here to view
Standard in all head celebratory gunshot injuries (CGIs) and gunshot wounds (GSWs), consultations with trauma surgery, pediatric surgery, neurosurgery, and admission to pediatric ICU were expedited, followed by intensive therapy. The patient experienced full neurological recovery.
This case necessitated the basic understanding of physics, wound ballistics, unique considerations of CGIs, and associated legal issues. In general, the amount of energy transferred to the tissue is of greater importance than velocity. At the top of its parabolic flight, the combustive force equals the gravitational force and air resistance, creating a velocity of zero. Throughout this time-specific period, random external forces (wind patterns) change its flight trajectory.  This is supported by injury data. 
In general, injury includes the following:The bullet pierces the skin and skull, causing a beveling or a crater defect and the formation of a tunnel that is 3-4 times its diameter due to cavitation and other injury mechanisms. , Irregular bone fragments pass through the tissue. Periorbital ecchymosis ("raccoon eyes") occurs due to orbital plate fractures or increasing cerebrospinal pressure.  If there is an exit wound, it would generally form on the skull's outer surface in the form of a crater due to the tumbling trajectory in situ. 
Identifying CGI entrance and exit wounds is challenging due to the lack of forensic information such as soot deposits, seared wound edges, or tattoos from gunpowder deposits.  Victims and eyewitnesses do not report hearing any related sound prior to the impact or any confrontation, as was reported in this case.
There are two notable legal considerations. First, most states have mandatory gunshot wound reporting. Various organizations voluntarily report and compile information nationally (Centers for Disease Control, etc). Additionally, emergency physicians can serve as witnesses in legal proceedings, sometimes 6-12 months after the patient is discharged, although rare in case of CGIs. Clinical findings and sensitive patient information can be utilized. This calls for prudent documentation and acquiring additional forensic education as needed.  Physicians should continue to be stewards of patient privacy considering potential media involvement. Finally, preventative local advocacy efforts against CGIs can be strengthened with physician involvement. CGIs, although rare, present unique challenges in medical assessment, treatment, and documentation that have implications in daily clinical practice and future legal proceedings.
| References|| |
Volgas DA, Stannard JP, Alonso JE. Ballistics: A primer for the surgeon. Injury 2005;36:373-9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). New year′s eve injuries caused by celebratory gunfire--Puerto Rico, 2003. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2004;53:1174-5.
Shkrum MJ, Ramsay DA. Forensic Pathology of Trauma: Common Problems for the Pathologist. Totowa: Humana Press; 2007. p. 332-3, 338.
Tintinalli JE, Stapczynski JS, MA OJ, Cline DM, Cydulka R, Meckler GD, editors. Tintinalli′s Emergency Medicine: A Comprehensive Study Guide. 7 th
ed. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2011. p. 1703.
Apfelbaum JD, Shockley LW, Wahe JW, Moore EE. Entrance and exit gunshot wounds: Incorrect terms for the emergency department? J Emerg Med 1998;16:741-5.
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]