Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 76

 

Home  | About Us | Editors | Search | Ahead Of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit Article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
     


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2016  |  Volume : 6  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 143-147

Early and late intramedullary nailing of femur fracture: A single center experience


1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Al-Wakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
2 Department of Surgery, Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar
3 Department of Surgery, Section of Trauma Surgery, Clinical Research, Hamad Medical Corporation; Department of Clinical Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, Doha, Qatar

Date of Web Publication16-Sep-2016

Correspondence Address:
Ahmad S Alobaidi
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Al-Wakra Hospital, Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha
Qatar
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/2229-5151.190649

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 

Background: Femur fracture (FF) is a common injury, and intramedullary nailing (IMN) is the standard surgical fixation. However, the time of intervention remains controversial. We aimed to describe the reamed IMN (rIMN) timing and hospital outcomes in trauma patients presenting with FF.
Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted for all patients admitted with FF and they underwent fixation at level 1 trauma unit between January 2010 and January 2012. Patients were divided into Group I with early rIMN (<12 h) and Group II with late rIMN (≥12 h). Patients' demographics, clinical presentations, mechanism of injury, pulmonary complications, organ failure, length of stay, and mortality were described.
Results: A total of 307 eligible patients with FF were identified (156 patients in Group I and 151 patients in Group II). Patients in Group II were older (36 ± 18 vs. 29 ± 9;P= 0.001) and had higher rate of polytrauma (35% vs. 18%,P= 0.001), head injury (5% vs. 12%,P= 0.68) and bilateral FF (10.7% vs. 5.1%;P= 0.07) in comparison to Group I. Group II had longer stay in Intensive Care Unit (7 [1–56] vs. 2 [1–17] days;P= 0.009) and hospital (13 [2–236] vs. 9 [1–367];P= 0.001). There were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups in terms of sepsis, renal failure, fat embolism, adult respiratory distress syndrome and death.
Conclusions: Based on this analysis, we believe that early rIMN is safe in appropriately selected cases. In patients with traumatic FFs, early rIMN is associated with low hospital complications and shorter hospital stay. The rate of pulmonary complications is almost the same in the early and late group. Further prospective randomized studies with large sample size would be ideal using the information garnered from the present study.

Keywords: Femur, fracture, intramedullary nailing, outcomes, reamed, timing, trauma


How to cite this article:
Alobaidi AS, Al-Hassani A, El-Menyar A, Abdelrahman H, Tuma M, Al-Thani H, Aldosari MA. Early and late intramedullary nailing of femur fracture: A single center experience. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2016;6:143-7

How to cite this URL:
Alobaidi AS, Al-Hassani A, El-Menyar A, Abdelrahman H, Tuma M, Al-Thani H, Aldosari MA. Early and late intramedullary nailing of femur fracture: A single center experience. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 Oct 28];6:143-7. Available from: https://www.ijciis.org/text.asp?2016/6/3/143/190649


   Introduction Top


Traumatic femur fractures (FFs) continue to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide.[1] Regardless of the patient age and injury severity, a previous study showed that in comparison to delayed stabilization, an early definitive stabilization of FF is found to have fewer complications.[2] Currently the standard of care for definitive treatment for most diaphyseal fractures of the femur is intramedullary nailing (IMN).[3] This approach can be performed expediently, through minimal incisions with almost no significant blood loss, and in most cases, patients can be early mobilized. However, in patient with multiple injuries, the type and timing of FF stabilization remains controversial.[4] There are rationales for early FF fixation as it associated with increased patient mobility, lesser pulmonary complications, and reduced length of hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay.[5],[6],[7],[8] Some studies suggested that early definitive surgery in polytrauma patients, especially with chest and head injuries, resulted in increased rate of complications and mortality.[9],[10],[11],[12],[13],[14],[15],[16] Contrarily, Brundage et al.[17] reported early internal fixation after adequate resuscitation (<24 h) was correlated with better prognosis in concomitant head or chest trauma patients. However, regardless of the associated injuries, two systematic reviews demonstrated no difference in morbidity or mortality between early (<24 h) and late operative treatment of femoral shaft fractures.[18],[19]

Alternatively, damage-control orthopedics (DCO) involves external fixation followed by delayed definitive treatment has the advantage of giving more time for resuscitation, and might halt the inflammatory cascade provoked by polytrauma and definitive surgery.[20],[21],[22] The present study aims to describe the reamed (rIMN) and its timing on the in-hospital outcomes in trauma patients presenting with FF.


   Materials and Methods Top


A retrospective analysis was conducted for data of the trauma registry at Hamad General Hospital, the only level 1 trauma center in Qatar over a period of 24 months from January 2010 to January 2012.

Inclusion criteria

All patients ≥14 years and <80 years who sustained trauma with single or bilateral FFs (shaft) and underwent IMN (piriformis entry and close nailing). All patients underwent reamed antegrade nailing. Although retrograde nailing is preferable in bilateral FF, our institution used that for some of ipsilateral femur and tibia fracture as well as some distal shaft FF; this mostly depends on the surgeon discretion and availability of resources. Using AO nails or Trigen nails entirely depends on surgeon's preference.

Exclusion criteria

Patients <14 and ≥80 years, patients who died within 24 h of admission, and patients with femoral neck fractures, or pathological fracture.

All the trauma patients were initially resuscitated in the trauma room according to advanced trauma life support protocol. Patients were taken to the operating room (OR), trauma ICU, or trauma ward depending on the patient stability and associated injuries. The charts of all patients were reviewed and data were gathered including age, sex, mechanism of injury, pattern of injuries (unilateral or bilateral), FFs, associated injuries to other systems, injury severity scoring (ISS), abbreviated injury scale, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and hospital outcomes (length of stay [LOS], pulmonary complications, organ failure, sepsis, and mortality).

Treatment groups

patients were divided into two groups: Group I (early); those whose FFs were treated with primary rIMN <12 h of injury and Group II (late); those whose FFs were treated ≥12 h. All operative notes were reviewed to determine the time and date of each surgical procedure.

Definitions

SIRS was defined as presence of the following criteria: Body temperature ≥38°C/≤36°C, heart rate ≥90 bpm, respiratory rate ≥20/min or PaCO2 <32 mmHg, and neutrophil count ≥12,000/mL or ≤4000/mL.[23]

Adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is defined as the acute onset of respiratory failure, bilateral infiltrates on chest radiograph, hypoxemia as defined by a PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤200 mmHg, and no evidence of left atrial hypertension or a pulmonary capillary pressure <18 mmHg (if measured) to rule out cardiogenic edema.[24]

Polytrauma is defined as two or more severe injuries in at least two areas of the body with an ISS ≥16.[25]

Death during the primary hospitalization was documented in the trauma database.

The need for informed consent was waived by the Ethical Committee since rights and interests of the patients would not be violated and their privacy and anonymity would be assured by this study design. This study was approved by the Medical Research Center at Hamad Medical Corporation; Institutional Review Board#12176/12.

Statistical analysis

The data were presented as proportions, medians, or mean ± standard deviation, as appropriate. Comparison was carried mainly between early (<12 h) and late treatment (≥12 h) groups. Differences in categorical variables were analyzed using the Chi-square test and the continuous variables were analyzed using Student's t-test. Two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All data analyses were carried out using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA).


   Results Top


During the study period, out of 2800 trauma patients admitted to our center, 355 patients had FFs. After exclusion of 48 patients who were not fixed due to early mortality from severe head injury, 307 patients met the inclusion criteria. The majority of patients were males (96%) involved in traffic-related injuries or fall from height during construction work. Patients' age ranged from 16 to 48 years with a mean of 33 ± 14.7 years. The patient demographics in each group were similar for sex and mechanism of injury; however, patients in Group II were 7 years older (P = 0.001). Open fractures were greater in Group I in comparison to Group II (14% vs. 4%; P = 0.002).

There were 24 (8%) patients with bilateral FFs, 28 (9%) patients with open fractures and 38 (12.4%) patients had associated tibia fractures.

Patients were divided into two groups: 156 (51%) were in Group I (rIMN < 12 h) and 151 (49%) were in Group II (rIMN ≥ 12 h). There were 22 (14%) and 6 (4%) patients with open FF in Group I and Group II, respectively, (P = 0.002). In Group I, bilateral FF was present in eight (5%) cases whereas 16 (10.7%) patients had bilateral FFs in Group II. The associated tibial fractures were comparable among the two groups [Table 1].
Table 1: Demographics and outcomes based on time to operate

Click here to view


The median time from admission to primary IMN for the early group was 3.2 h and for the late group was 68 h. Severe injury (ISS > 15) was more frequently seen in Group II in comparison to Group I (23 ± 6 vs. 21 ± 4; P = 0.044). There were significantly more number of patients in Group II who had polytrauma than in Group I (34% vs. 17%; P = 0.001) [Table 2].
Table 2: Associated injuries

Click here to view


The number of mean red blood cells units transfused within first 24 h was comparable among the two groups [Table 3]. Group II had longer stay in ICU (7 [1–56] vs. 2 [1–17] P = 0.009) days and hospital (13 [2–236) vs. 9 [1–367]; P = 0.001). Although, complications were greater in Group II, there were no significant differences in the outcomes between the two groups in terms of wound infection, sepsis and ARDS. The rates of SIRS and fat embolism were similar in the two groups and no cases of renal failure were reported in either group. Only one case of death was reported in Group I; it was isolated FF complicated with fat embolism and ARDS.
Table 3: Posttreatment complications

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


The present study describes the rIMN timing (early vs. late fixation) and hospital outcomes in nonhomogenous trauma patients presenting with FF in a single trauma tertiary center. According to this analysis, the rate FF is around 11 cases/100,000/year which is consistent with the international rates (10–21 cases/100,000/year).[1] Nearly, half of our patients had early fixation and showed few complications, and short hospital stay. This finding is in agreement with previous studies showing a potential benefit of early definitive surgery in patients who are stable enough for IMN.[7],[8] Moreover, the late FF fixation group tended to be severely injured, as evident from ISS and associated injuries. In addition, the most common cause of delay in polytrauma patients was head injury and lack of immediate OR availability.

The present report also shows that the hospital complications in patients who underwent rIMN beyond 12 h of admission were not high as well. In a recent study by Harvin et al.,[4] a 57% decrease in pulmonary complication was observed when IMN was performed within 24 h of admission and even when considering only those patients with high ISS.

The only statistical significant difference in our data is the length of ICU and hospital stay, which basically reflected the higher ISS and thus the severity and multiplicity of associated injuries, particularly head injury which may confound the decision to operate and prolong the stay both in ICU and hospital.

Consistently, Brundage et al.[17] did find a significant increase in complications such as pneumonia, ARDS, and length of hospital stay among patients who were managed between 2 and 5 days after the injury. However, the authors did not report significant difference in mortality in association with the treatment timing. Another retrospective study evaluated 97 severely injured patients with ISS > 25 and found no difference in the rate of ARDS, multiple organ failure, and LOS when early IMN and DCO were compared.[26] In our study, only two cases underwent external fixation before conversion to rIMN in Group II.

A recent multicenter randomized control trial compared early IMN (<24 h) and DCO for FFs in 165 patients.[27] The authors concluded that primary femoral IMN is associated with shorter ventilation time in stable cases, a higher incidence of lung dysfunction in borderline cases in comparison to those who underwent external fixation and later conversion to IMN. In that study, IMN affected the outcome mainly in patients with polytrauma.

Also, Nahm et al.[2] reported that early fixation is associated with fewer complications (pulmonary problems, organ failure, sepsis, and deep vein thrombosis [DVT]), and shorter LOS suggesting that it is an appropriate option for most patients. In addition, delay in definitive stabilization of FFs was directly proportional to the development of both pulmonary and other complications. These findings are coined in other studies.[12],[16] Morshed et al.[16] studied the impact of timing of definitive femoral shaft fracture fixation among polytrauma subjects with ISS > 15. Patients were divided into three subgroups based on the timing of femoral fixation (within 12 h, 12 h to 24 h, and > 24 h). Mortality rates for these groups were 3.7%, 1.9%, and 4.3%, respectively. In our study, the overall mortality was very low, one death only in the early group (<12 h) that was related to fat embolism and pulmonary complications.

It has been proposed that delayed femoral repair beyond 12 h after injury may afford time for adequate resuscitation, which could reduce the risk of mortality by 50% in polytrauma patients and head injury.[16]

The incidence of ARDS was nonsignificantly lower in the early group, compared to the delayed group in our study. Nahm et al.[2] reported ARDS more often in patients treated after 24 h (4.8%). Harvin et al.[4] reported very low rate of ARDS (0.6%) for those who underwent IMN, even in the presence of multiple injuries. Furthermore, O'Toole et al.[20] studied the ARDS incidence in several subgroups of patients with polytrauma who had early definite fixation versus DCO and found that patients who underwent primary IMN had lower incidence of ARDS (1.5%).

The proportion of sepsis in the present study was higher in the delayed treatment group, however, this observational difference was statistically nonsignificant and could be attributed in part to the presence of associated injuries and/or prolonged hospital LOS.

Because the complications were low in early treatment group, early fixation could facilitate early mobility, minimize hospital stay and reduce the risk of sepsis. We could not report pneumonia or DVT during patients hospital stay.

The low rate of bilateral FF (0.8%) in our study over 2 years is consistent with the current literature.[28]

Limitations

There are some limitations to this study. It is a retrospective observational study and so the major bias is that the groups were retrospectively assigned based on the intervention (i.e. early or late fixation) which may introduce a selection bias. The younger, healthier and less injured cases got early fixation and vice versa. Therefore, patients with lower injury severity were likely elected to proceed with earlier intervention than the older, more severely injured patients. So, the two groups (early vs. late fixation) were not homogenous and cannot be controlled well. Unmeasured confounding factors such as time from injury to hospital admission could bias the effect of treatment time. In addition, head injury was the most common cause for the delayed intervention in our study population. Given the small sample size, and numbers of outcome variables, multivariate analysis could not be performed to adjust confounders in the study. The surgical procedures duration was not documented in the database. This study addressed only the short-term outcome, i.e. the pulmonary complication and hospital stay and therefore no long-term follow-up was reported, which is another limitation of this analysis. Although, Gustilo–Anderson open fracture classification system is the widely used classification system for open fractures,[29] we used broadly the term “open fracture” to refer to all fractures that had communication to the exterior and so we did not segregate them in groups.

The power of the study is not adequate to draw solid comparative difference between the two groups and to analyze those who underwent surgery beyond 12 h. Moreover, selection bias cannot be ruled out as the decision for surgery type was physician discretion. However, with the abovementioned limitations, the beneficial effect of early fixation cannot be ignored.


   Conclusions Top


We believe that early fixation is safe in appropriately selected cases. In our center, patients presenting with traumatic FFs, early rIMN is associated with low hospital complications and shorter hospital stay. The rate of pulmonary complications is almost the same in the early and late group. Further prospective randomized studies with large sample size would be ideal using the information garnered from the present study.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Enninghorst N, McDougall D, Evans JA, Sisak K, Balogh ZJ. Population-based epidemiology of femur shaft fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2013;74:1516-20.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Nahm NJ, Como JJ, Wilber JH, Vallier HA. Early appropriate care: Definitive stabilization of femoral fractures within 24 hours of injury is safe in most patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma 2011;71:175-85.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Ricci WM, Gallagher B, Haidukewych GJ. Intramedullary nailing of femoral shaft fractures: Current concepts. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009;17:296-305.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Harvin JA, Harvin WH, Camp E, Caga-Anan Z, Burgess AR, Wade CE, et al. Early femur fracture fixation is associated with a reduction in pulmonary complications and hospital charges: A decade of experience with 1,376 diaphyseal femur fractures. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2012;73:1442-8.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Lhowe DW, Hansen ST. Immediate nailing of open fractures of the femoral shaft. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1988;70:812-20.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Scalea TM, Boswell SA, Scott JD, Mitchell KA, Kramer ME, Pollak AN. External fixation as a bridge to intramedullary nailing for patients with multiple injuries and with femoral fractures: Damage control orthopedics. J Trauma 2000;48:613-23.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Bone LB, Johnson KD, Weigelt J, Scheinberg R. Early versus delayed stabilization of femoral fractures. A prospective randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:336-40.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Behrman SW, Fabian TC, Kudsk KA, Taylor JC. Improved outcome with femur fractures: Early vs. delayed fixation. J Trauma 1990;30:792-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Pape HC, Regel G, Dwenger A, Sturm JA, Tscherne H. Influence of thoracic trauma and primary femoral intramedullary nailing on the incidence of ARDS in multiple trauma patients. Injury 1993;24 Suppl 3:S82-103.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Jaicks RR, Cohn SM, Moller BA. Early fracture fixation may be deleterious after head injury. J Trauma 1997;42:1-5.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Townsend RN, Lheureau T, Protech J, Rimer B, Simon D. Timing fracture repair in patients with severe brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score≤9). J Trauma 1998;44:977-82.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Charash WE, Fabian TC, Croce MA. Delayed surgical fixation of femur fractures is a risk factor for pulmonary failure independent of thoracic trauma. J Trauma 1994;37:667-72.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Bosse MJ, MacKenzie EJ, Riemer BL, Brumback RJ, McCarthy ML, Burgess AR, et al. Adult respiratory distress syndrome, pneumonia, and mortality following thoracic injury and a femoral fracture treated either with intramedullary nailing with reaming or with a plate. A comparative study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:799-809.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Starr AJ, Hunt JL, Chason DP, Reinert CM, Walker J. Treatment of femur fracture with associated head injury. J Orthop Trauma 1998;12:38-45.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Weninger P, Figl M, Spitaler R, Mauritz W, Hertz H. Early unreamed intramedullary nailing of femoral fractures is safe in patients with severe thoracic trauma. J Trauma 2007;62:692-6.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Morshed S, Miclau T 3rd, Bembom O, Cohen M, Knudson MM, Colford JM Jr. Delayed internal fixation of femoral shaft fracture reduces mortality among patients with multisystem trauma. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009;91:3-13.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Brundage SI, McGhan R, Jurkovich GJ, Mack CD, Maier RV. Timing of femur fracture fixation: Effect on outcome in patients with thoracic and head injuries. J Trauma 2002;52:299-307.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Rixen D, Grass G, Sauerland S, Lefering R, Raum MR, Yücel N, et al. Evaluation of criteria for temporary external fixation in risk-adapted damage control orthopedic surgery of femur shaft fractures in multiple trauma patients: “Evidence-based medicine” versus “reality” in the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society. J Trauma 2005;59:1375-94.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Dunham CM, Bosse MJ, Clancy TV, Cole FJ Jr., Coles MJ, Knuth T, et al. Practice management guidelines for the optimal timing of long-bone fracture stabilization in polytrauma patients: The EAST Practice Management Guidelines Work Group. J Trauma 2001;50:958-67.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
O'Toole RV, O'Brien M, Scalea TM, Habashi N, Pollak AN, Turen CH. Resuscitation before stabilization of femoral fractures limits acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with multiple traumatic injuries despite low use of damage control orthopedics. J Trauma 2009;67:1013-21.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
O'Brien PJ. Fracture fixation in patients having multiple injuries. Can J Surg 2003;46:124-8.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Pape HC, Grimme K, Van Griensven M, Sott AH, Giannoudis P, Morley J, et al. Impact of intramedullary instrumentation versus damage control for femoral fractures on immunoinflammatory parameters: Prospective randomized analysis by the EPOFF study group. J Trauma 2003;55:7-13.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Pittet D, Rangel-Frausto S, Li N, Tarara D, Costigan M, Rempe L, et al. Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock: Incidence, morbidities and outcomes in surgical ICU patients. Intensive Care Med 1995;21:302-9.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Bernard GR, Artigas A, Brigham KL, Carlet J, Falke K, Hudson L, et al. The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS. Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1994;149 (3 Pt 1):818-24.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Mica L, Rufibach K, Keel M, Trentz O. The risk of early mortality of polytrauma patients associated to ISS, NISS, APACHE II values and prothrombin time. J Trauma Manag Outcomes 2013;7:6.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Tuttle MS, Smith WR, Williams AE, Agudelo JF, Hartshorn CJ, Moore EE, et al. Safety and efficacy of damage control external fixation versus early definitive stabilization for femoral shaft fractures in the multiple-injured patient. J Trauma 2009;67:602-5.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Pape HC, Rixen D, Morley J, Husebye EE, Mueller M, Dumont C, et al. Impact of the method of initial stabilization for femoral shaft fractures in patients with multiple injuries at risk for complications (borderline patients). Ann Surg 2007;246:491-9.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Steinhausen E, Lefering R, Tjardes T, Neugebauer EA, Bouillon B, Rixen D. Committee on Emergency Medicine, et al. A risk-adapted approach is beneficial in the management of bilateral femoral shaft fractures in multiple trauma patients: An analysis based on the trauma registry of the German Trauma Society. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2014;76:1288-93.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Gustilo RB, Anderson JT. Prevention of infection in the treatment of one thousand and twenty-five open fractures of long bones: Retrospective and prospective analyses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:453-8.  Back to cited text no. 29
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]


This article has been cited by
1 THE PHENOMENON OF «SECOND HIT» AFTER OPERATIONS OF OSTEOSYNTHESIS IN CASE OF POLY-TRAUMA
Yu. G. Shapkin,P. A. Seliverstov,E. A. Skripal
Medical Journal of the Russian Federation. 2019; 23(6): 331
[Pubmed] | [DOI]
2 Early versus late intramedullary nailing for traumatic femur fracture management: meta-analysis
Ayman El-Menyar,Mohammed Muneer,David Samson,Hassan Al-Thani,Ahmad Alobaidi,Paul Mussleman,Rifat Latifi
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2018; 13(1)
[Pubmed] | [DOI]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2187    
    Printed40    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded105    
    Comments [Add]    
    Cited by others 2    

Recommend this journal