Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 42

 

Home  | About Us | Editors | Search | Ahead Of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit Article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
     


 
 
Table of Contents
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 129-133

Cardiac transplantation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the United States 2003–2011


Department of Cardiology, St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, PA, USA

Date of Submission09-Oct-2019
Date of Acceptance25-Feb-2020
Date of Web Publication22-Sep-2020

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Jamshid Shirani
Department of Cardiology, St. Luke'fs University Health Network 801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, PA 18015
USA
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_82_19

Rights and Permissions
   Abstract 


Background: Cardiac transplant (CT) is the sole option in a minority of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) adults with refractory symptoms or end-stage disease.
Aims/Methods: We aimed to examine the trends and hospital outcomes of CT in HC using 2003-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample database.
Results: HC comprised 1.1% of CT (151 of 14,277) performed during this time period (age 45±12 years, 67% male, 79% Caucasians). Number of HC CT increased from 2003 to 2011 (odds ratio=1.174; 95% confidence interval=1.102-1.252; P<0.001). Comorbidities included congestive heart failure (76%), hypertension (23%), chronic kidney disease (23%), hyperlipidemia (19%), diabetes (13%), and coronary artery disease (10%). Acute in-hospital major adverse events occurred in 1 in 4 (23%) patient and 1 in 25 (3.8%) patients died perioperatively. Other major adverse events included allograft rejection or vasculopathy (23%), postoperative stroke or transient ischemic attack (3.5%), acute renal failure (43%), respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation (13%), sepsis (10%) or need for blood transfusion (10%). Compared to 1990-2004 United Network of Organ Sharing registry data (n=303), patients in current cohort had more comorbid conditions [diabetes (13%-vs-0%); chronic obstructive lung disease (9%-vs-1%); P < 0.001 for both), were more likely to be male (66%-vs-48% P<0.001), were less likely to be Caucasian (79%-vs-86%; P < 0.001) or smokers (3%-vs-17%; P < 0.001) and less often required perioperative circulatory support or hemodialysis (17%-vs-49%, P < 0.001 and 3.2%-vs-8.3%, P = 0.04, respectively).
Conclusion: HC comprises a small proportion of patients undergoing CT. The annual number of CT in HC has increased in recent years at least in part due to inclusion of patients with more comorbid conditions. Transplant recipients in the current cohort, however, required less postoperative circulatory support or renal replacement therapy.

Keywords: Cardiac transplant, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, major adverse cardiac events, mortality, national inpatient sample, prognosis


How to cite this article:
Vallabhaneni S, Singh A, Meera SJ, Shirani J. Cardiac transplantation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the United States 2003–2011. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2020;10:129-33

How to cite this URL:
Vallabhaneni S, Singh A, Meera SJ, Shirani J. Cardiac transplantation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in the United States 2003–2011. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci [serial online] 2020 [cited 2020 Dec 1];10:129-33. Available from: https://www.ijciis.org/text.asp?2020/10/3/129/295778




   Introduction Top


Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HC) is the most common genetic cardiac disease with an estimated prevalence of at least 1:500.[1],[2] The disease is caused by mutations in genes encoding sarcomere and sarcomere-related proteins and has an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with variable penetration and heterogeneous phenotypic expression.[3],[4] In recent years, earlier diagnosis, effective risk stratification, family screening, close monitoring, and pharmacologic, device, as well as surgical management has made the condition compatible with normal lifespan in most affected individuals.[5] Disease progression, however, may lead to severe refractory congestive heart failure (CHF) in a certain subset of patients, ultimately requiring cardiac transplant (CT).[6] The latter is characterized by marked adverse left ventricular (LV) remodeling with chamber dilation and extensive myocardial scarring that lead to systolic heart failure[7],[8] although refractory CHF may also be observed in some without significant LV remodeling or systolic dysfunction.[9] Cardiac resynchronization therapy,[10] implantation of LV assist devices,[11],[12] and apical myectomy[13] have provided symptomatic improvement for selected patients with HC and refractory CHF. However, for most patients with HC and refractory CHF, CT remains the only durable therapeutic option as reported in several single-center,[14],[15],[16],[17],[18] double-center,[9] and registry studies.[19],[20] The aim of the current study was to evaluate recent trends in and in-hospital outcomes of CT in HC.


   Methods Top


Data source

Data were obtained from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database, a part of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization sponsored by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, for calendar years 2003 through 2011 as previously described.[21],[22],[23] The database contains discharge-level data for ~8 million hospital stays from ~1000 hospitals each year. It is designed to approximate a 20% stratified sample of community hospitals. A total of 46 states, representing ~96% of the United States population, participate in NIS. Hospital ownership, patient volume, teaching status, urban or rural location, and geographic region are used for stratified sampling; and discharge weights provided by the sponsor are used to obtain national estimates. The database is publicly available and contains de-identified information; and therefore, the study was deemed exempt from institutional research board review.

Study population

All hospitalizations with a principal diagnosis ( first or second diagnosis) of CT were included in the study. This was done using an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code for CT. The study sample included a total of 14,277 patients. Among patients with CT, subset with HC (n = 151) was identified. Patient and hospital characteristics along with outcome parameters were extracted using appropriate ICD-9-CM codes.

Patient and hospital characteristics

Baseline demographic and clinical features studied included both patient-level and hospital-level characteristics. Patient-level characteristics included demographics, primary payer, income quartile, all comorbidity measures for use with administrative data, and other cardiovascular comorbidities (tobacco smoking, obesity, dyslipidemia, diabetes, and heart failure). Hospital-level characteristics included hospital location (urban or rural), hospital bed size (small, medium, or large), hospital region (Northeast, Midwest, South, or West), and teaching versus nonteaching status. All demographics, clinical characteristics, comorbidities, in-hospital procedures, complications, and outcomes were evaluated using appropriate ICD-9-CM Software codes.

Outcome measures

The outcome measures evaluated were in-hospital mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest, acute systolic or diastolic CHF, intra-aortic balloon pump use, cardioverter-defibrillator implantation, discharge to a facility other than home, length of stay, cost of hospitalization, and major adverse cardiovascular events. The latter was defined as in-hospital mortality, length of hospital stay exceeding 4 days, acute heart failure, cardiogenic shock, and discharge to a facility other than home.

Statistical analysis

Weighted data were used for all statistical analyses. Results were expressed as numbers (%) for categorical variables and mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables. Differences between groups were analyzed with the use of the Student's t-test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables, respectively. Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to report the trend in the rate of CT in HC over the study period. A two-tailed P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS statistical software version 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, USA). Comparisons of the length of stay between the two groups were performed using the independent samples Mann–Whitney U-test.


   Results Top


Patient characteristics

Between 2003 and 2011, a total of 14,277 adults (age ≥18 years) underwent CT in the United States. Among these, 151 (1.1%) were done in patients with HC (mean age 45 ± 2 years, 67% male, 79% Caucasians).

Comparison of patients with and without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups of patients are shown and compared in [Table 1]. As shown, patients with HC were significantly younger and more likely to be male and had significantly lower prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and smoking. A trend at increasing number of HC CT was noted during the study period (OR = 1.174; 95% CI = 1.102–1.252; P < 0.001). HC CT was often performed emergently (39%) and in Northeastern and Midwestern hospitals (61%). [Table 2] compares outcomes and procedural complications of CT in patients with and without HC. As shown, the two groups had similar outcomes except for longer length of stay and higher rate of vascular complications requiring surgery for patients with HC and higher rates of postoperative blood transfusion for non-HC patients.
Table 1: Comparison of demographic, clinical, and admission characteristics of cardiac transplant patients with and without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Click here to view
Table 2: Comparison of cardiac transplant outcomes in patients with and without hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Click here to view


Comparison with a prior cohort

[Table 3] compares the current data with that of 1990–2004 United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry for HC CT (n = 303). HC CT comprised similar proportion of all CT (1%) in both periods. In addition, the two cohorts had similar age (45 ± 2 vs. 43 ± 13 years, P = NS). However, patients in the current cohort had higher prevalence of diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases were more likely to be male and were less often Caucasians or smokers. Perioperative circulatory support and hemodialysis were less often required in the current cohort compared to UNOS HC CT (17% vs. 49% [P < 0.001] and 3.2% vs. 8.3% [P = 0.04], respectively).
Table 3: Comparison of 2003-2011 nationwide inpatient sample and 1990-2004 united network for organ sharing registry for cardiac transplant in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Summary of the findings

The present data indicate that CT remains a viable option for certain individuals with end-stage HC. The number of patients with HC undergoing CT has increased in recent years in parallel to the increase in total number of CT performed in the United States annually. However, HC comprises a small proportion (~1%) of total number of CT performed in this country. The current cohort indicates that CT is now offered to HC patients with higher prevalence of comorbid conditions at significantly improved postoperative outcomes as indicated by lower rates of circulatory support and renal replacement therapy. Acute in-hospital major adverse events and mortality were similar in HC and non-HC patients undergoing CT.

Previous studies

Recent years have witnessed a dramatic improvement in the outcome of patients with HC through effective risk stratification and the use of primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillators, septal reduction therapy, and CT.[5] A predictable consequence of such a success is an increase in the number of HC patients living long enough for their disease to transition into the end-stage where CT would become the sole option.[20] The latter has been effectively shown in a review of the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients data that showed an increase of 44% of patients with HC in need of CT between 2008–2016 compared and 1999–2008.[20] It was noted that the HC patients undergoing CT in more recent era were older and in similar to the current cohort, had a higher burden of comorbid conditions.[20]

An important consideration in patients with HC is the lower likelihood of patients with HC to receive mechanical circulatory support while awaiting CT due to their small and stiff LV.[11],[24] As patients on mechanical circulatory support were prioritized for CT in the UNOS heart allocation policy that caused a serious disadvantage for HC patients. Requests in status upgrades for HC patients may have circumvented the situation as indicated by tripling of CT in HC through urgency status by exception.[20] This was consistent with our observation that CT in HC patients was more likely to be performed as an emergency compared to non-HC patients (40% vs. 30%, P = 0.01) possibly reflecting request for status upgrade in HC.

Clinical implications

CT will remain an important option for minority of patients with HC who progress to an end-stage of the disease characterized by both systolic and diastolic heart failure, as well as LV dilation, wall thinning, and extensive scarring.[9],[25],[26],[27],[28] Our study did not provide survival data for HC CT beyond that for the index hospital admission (3.8%). Previous single or double-center studies, spanning from 1984 to 2016, have reported 30-day mortality rates of 0%–9% in such patients.[14],[17],[18] Reported 1 and 5 years' mortality rates in this setting have ranged from 0% to 15% and 8%–25%, respectively.[16],[18],[19],[20] While 1 year mortality rates for CT in HC and non-HC patients were relatively close (12.6%-vs.-14.7%, P = 0.03), the 5 years' mortality was significantly in favor of patients with HC (20%-vs.-28%, P < 0.0001) in these cohorts.[16],[18],[19],[20] These differences may, in part, be explained by significant baseline differences in age and comorbid conditions in HC and non-HC patients undergoing CT.[16],[18],[19],[20] As shown in our cohort, non-HC patients undergoing CT were significantly older (by an average of 9 years) and had higher prevalence of hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, and smoking at baseline.

Study limitations

This is a retrospective review of data derived from a large, nationally representative database. The accuracy of the data is influenced by the quality and reliability of the individual hospital coding practices. Information on comorbidities was obtained from administrative data, and each admission was regarded as representing one individual. It is, however, unlikely that multiple admissions for CT occurred in the same patient. Finally, the database does not contain information regarding medications and results of cardiac diagnostic tests. Despite these limitations, the data provides real life trends in CT in HC patients over a span of 9 years and appears to be complementary to the already existing data.


   Conclusions Top


Our data indicate that HC comprises a small proportion of patients undergoing CT. The annual number of CT in HC has increased in recent years at least in part due to the inclusion of patients with more comorbid conditions while the age at CT has remained relatively stable. In comparison to older cohorts, it appears that more recent cohort of HC patients undergoing CT has a higher prevalence of comorbid conditions yet has required less circulatory support or renal replacement therapy postoperatively.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Research quality and ethics statement

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board / Ethics Committee. The authors followed applicable EQUATOR Network (http://www.equator-network.org/) guidelines during the conduct of this research project.



 
   References Top

1.
Maron BJ, Gardin JM, Flack JM, Gidding SS, Kurosaki TT, Bild DE. Prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in a general population of young adults. Echocardiographic analysis of 4111 subjects in the CARDIA Study. Coronary artery risk development in (young) adults. Circulation 1995;92:785-9.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Semsarian C, Ingles J, Maron MS, Maron BJ. New perspectives on the prevalence of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2015;65:1249-54.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Maron BJ, Maron MS, Semsarian C. Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after 20 years: Clinical perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:705-15.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Ho CY, Day SM, Ashley EA, Michels M, Pereira AC, Jacoby D, et al. Genotype and Lifetime Burden of Disease in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Insights from the Sarcomeric Human Cardiomyopathy Registry (SHaRe). Circulation 2018;138:1387-98.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Maron BJ, Rowin EJ, Casey SA, Maron MS. How hypertrophic cardiomyopathy became a contemporary treatable genetic disease with low mortality: Shaped by 50 years of clinical research and practice. JAMA Cardiol 2016;1:98-105.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Maron BJ, Rowin EJ, Udelson JE, Maron MS. Clinical spectrum and management of heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. JACC Heart Fail 2018;6:353-63.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Shirani J, Maron BJ, Cannon RO 3rd, Shahin S, Roberts WC. Clinicopathologic features of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy managed by cardiac transplantation. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:434-40.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Galati G, Leone O, Pasquale F, Olivotto I, Biagini E, Grigioni F, et al. Histological and histometric characterization of myocardial fibrosis in end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A clinical-pathological study of 30 explanted hearts. Circ Heart Fail 2016;9. Pii: E003090.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Rowin EJ, Maron BJ, Kiernan MS, Casey SA, Feldman DS, Hryniewicz KM, et al. Advanced heart failure with preserved systolic function in nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Under-recognized subset of candidates for heart transplant. Circ Heart Fail 2014;7:967-75.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Cappelli F, Morini S, Pieragnoli P, Targetti M, Stefàno P, Marchionni N, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy for end-stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The need for disease-specific criteria. J Am Coll Cardiol 2018;71:464-6.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Topilsky Y, Pereira NL, Shah DK, Boilson B, Schirger JA, Kushwaha SS, et al. Left ventricular assist device therapy in patients with restrictive and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail 2011;4:266-75.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Sridharan L, Wayda B, Truby LK, Latif F, Restaino S, Takeda K, et al. Mechanical circulatory support device utilization and heart transplant waitlist outcomes in patients with restrictive and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail 2018;11:e004665.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Schaff HV, Brown ML, Dearani JA, Abel MD, Ommen SR, Sorajja P, et al. Apical myectomy: A new surgical technique for management of severely symptomatic patients with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010;139:634-40.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Coutu M, Perrault LP, White M, Pelletier GB, Racine N, Poirier NC, et al. Cardiac transplantation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A valid therapeutic option. J Heart Lung Transplant 2004;23:413-7.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Biagini E, Spirito P, Leone O, Picchio FM, Coccolo F, Ragni L, et al. Heart transplantation in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2008;101:387-92.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Kato TS, Takayama H, Yoshizawa S, Marboe C, Schulze PC, Farr M, et al. Cardiac transplantation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2012;110:568-74.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Lee MS, Zimmer R, Kobashigawa J. Long-term outcomes of orthotopic heart transplantation for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Transplant Proc 2014;46:1502-5.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Rowin EJ, Maron BJ, Abt P, Kiernan MS, Vest A, Costantino F, et al. Impact of advanced therapies for improving survival to heart transplant in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 2018;121:986-96.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Maron MS, Kalsmith BM, Udelson JE, Li W, DeNofrio D. Survival after cardiac transplantation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail 2010;3:574-9.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Zuñiga Cisneros J, Stehlik J, Selzman CH, Drakos SG, McKellar SH, Wever-Pinzon O. Outcomes in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy awaiting heart transplantation. Circ Heart Fail 2018;11:e004378.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Bhatia N, Agrawal S, Garg A, Mohananey D, Sharma A, Agarwal M, et al. Trends and outcomes of infective endocarditis in patients on dialysis. Clin Cardiol 2017;40:423-9.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Agrawal S, Garg L, Garg A, Mohananey D, Jain A, Manda Y, et al. Recent trends in management and in hospital outcomes of acute myocardial infarction in renal transplant recipients. Am J Cardiol 2017;119:542-52.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Agrawal S, Garg L, Sharma A, Mohananey D, Bhatia N, Singh A, et al. Comparison of inhospital mortality and frequency of coronary angiography on weekend versus weekday admissions in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 2016;118:632-4.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Sivathasan C, Tan TE, Sim D, Kerk KL. “Burnt out” dilated hypertrophic cardiomyopathy causing acute LVAD thrombosis. Clin Case Rep 2015;3:376-8.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Harris KM, Spirito P, Maron MS, Zenovich AG, Formisano F, Lesser JR, et al. Prevalence, clinical profile, and significance of left ventricular remodeling in the end-stage phase of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation 2006;114:216-25.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Ho CY, López B, Coelho-Filho OR, Lakdawala NK, Cirino AL, Jarolim P, et al. Myocardial fibrosis as an early manifestation of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med 2010;363:552-63.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Pasqualucci D, Fornaro A, Castelli G, Rossi A, Arretini A, Chiriatti C, et al. Clinical spectrum, therapeutic options, and outcome of advanced heart failure in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Heart Fail 2015;8:1014-21.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Maron MS, Rowin EJ, Olivotto I, Casey SA, Arretini A, Tomberli B, et al. Contemporary natural history and management of nonobstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2016;67:1399-409.  Back to cited text no. 28
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    Abstract
   Introduction
   Methods
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusions
    References
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed580    
    Printed15    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded12    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal