Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Users Online: 109

 

Home  | About Us | Editors | Search | Ahead Of Print | Current Issue | Archives | Submit Article | Instructions | Subscribe | Contacts | Login 
     


 
 
Table of Contents
LETTER TO EDITOR
Year : 2022  |  Volume : 12  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 58

Vasoactive-inotropic score and pediatric septic shock mortality: Correspondence


1 Private Academic Consultant, Bangkok, Thailand
2 Department of Community Medicine, Dr DY Patil University, Pune, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission27-Nov-2021
Date of Acceptance07-Dec-2021
Date of Web Publication24-Mar-2022

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Pathum Sookaromdee
Private Academic Consultant, Bangkok
Thailand
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_100_21

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Sookaromdee P, Wiwanitkit V. Vasoactive-inotropic score and pediatric septic shock mortality: Correspondence. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2022;12:58

How to cite this URL:
Sookaromdee P, Wiwanitkit V. Vasoactive-inotropic score and pediatric septic shock mortality: Correspondence. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci [serial online] 2022 [cited 2022 Dec 5];12:58. Available from: https://www.ijciis.org/text.asp?2022/12/1/58/340607



Dear Editor,

We would like to share ideas on “Validation of the vasoactive-inotropic score in predicting pediatric septic shock mortality: A retrospective cohort study.”[1] Pudjiadi et al. concluded that “vasoactive-inotropic score VIS >11 has a good ability to predict mortality in children with septic shock.”[1] We agree that vasoactive-inotropic score might be a good predictive clinical parameter. However, there are some concerns. First, mortality depends on several factors including the treatment given to the patient. Second, an inclusion criteria for subjects “1 month to 18 years” means heterogenicity of participants. Pathophysiology in small children is different from late adolescence. Finally, the reliability of the vasoactive-inotropic score is still an issue for assessment.[2] Pitfalls are reported and the important limitation of the score is no universally recognized version that consists of all commonly used vasoactive drugs.[3]

Research quality and ethics statement

This letter did not require approval by the Institutional Review Board / Ethics Committee. No specific EQUATOR Network (http://www.equator-network.org/) guidelines are available for letters to the editor.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflict of interest

None.



 
   References Top

1.
Pudjiadi AH, Pramesti DL, Pardede SO, Djer MM, Rohsiswatmo R, Kaswandani N. Validation of the vasoactive-inotropic score in predicting pediatric septic shock mortality: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci 2021;11:117-22.  Back to cited text no. 1
  [Full text]  
2.
Colleti J Jr., de Carvalho WB. Vasoactive-inotropic score: Is it reliable in pediatric sepsis as a predictive outcome measure? Pediatr Crit Care Med 2017;18:1003.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Belletti A, Lerose CC, Zangrillo A, Landoni G. Vasoactive-inotropic score: Evolution, clinical utility, and pitfalls. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2021;35:3067-77.  Back to cited text no. 3
    




 

Top
 
  Search
 
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
    Access Statistics
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  

 
  In this article
    References

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed504    
    Printed28    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded18    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal